Background & aims
Recent investigations have identified low vitamin D status as a hypothetical mechanism of insulin-resistance in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Instead, some authors supported the hypothesis that low vitamin D levels and insulin-resistance are 2 unrelated features of body size in PCOS. Hence, we aimed to explore the association of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) with anthropometric, metabolic and hormonal features in PCOS.
Methods
We assessed the association of low 25(OH)D levels with endocrine parameters, insulin-sensitivity evaluated by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) and body composition measured by DEXA in 38 women affected by PCOS.
Results
Low 25(OH)D (25(OH)D < 50 nmo/L) was detected in 37% of the entire cohort of patients. Body Mass Index (BMI), in particular total fat mass (p < 0.001), resulted to be the most predictor factor of 25(OH)D levels whereas Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), Free Androgen Index (FAI), glucose uptake and fat free mass were not.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrated that in PCOS low 25(OH)D levels are significantly determined by the degree of adiposity.

We read with interest the article by Kayaniyil et al. (1) that supplied elegant data suggesting that 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] is related to insulin resistance and β-cell function in a large population at high risk for type 2 diabetes and/or metabolic syndrome, thus concluding that 25(OH)D may be an independent risk factor for diabetes. We have, however, some concerns.

First, the studied population was mainly composed of obese subjects (the mean BMI was 30.5 kg/m2). Clearly, within a population with such a high BMI, the major variable influencing insulin sensitivity is fat mass. An increased fat mass (within the same BMI) could determine both the reduced insulin sensitivity and 25(OH)D. The two variables therefore correlate, but are not causally related. In our recently published article (2), we approached this important question by comparing two groups of obese subjects matched by BMI but different in terms of insulin sensitivity: no differences in 25(OH)D concentrations could be found, suggesting that the adipose tissue is its reservoir. Kayaniyil et al. themselves reported a weaker correlation in their obese (BMI >30 kg/m2) subpopulation but, unfortunately, they did not provide data on body composition.

Second, although the correlation within the high risk (for diabetes) population is intriguing, a control population is missing. In particular, it is not reported whether the studied population has lower 25(OH)D concentration than an hypothetical control cohort. If this was not the case, the working hypothesis fails. How could normal 25(OH)D determine insulin resistance?

Third, if 25(OH)D is involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, one would expect that a supplementation of calcitriol or its analogues would ameliorate the glucose metabolism. This was not the case either in insulin-resistant diabetic patients (3) or in healthy subjects (4).

As we (2) and others (5) reported, 25(OH)D concentration mainly reflects body fat mass; the reduction of fat mass, rather than vitamin D supplementation, is the main road for the prevention and treatment of insulin resistance and diabetes.

Several studies have shown that vitamin D may play a role in many biochemical mechanisms in addition to bone and calcium metabolism. Recently, vitamin D has sparked widespread interest because of its involvement in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system. Hypovitaminosis D has been associated with obesity, related to trapping in adipose tissue due to its lipophilic structure. In addition, vitamin D deficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and this may be due to the relationship between low vitamin D levels and obesity, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia, endothelial dysfunction and hypertension. However, although vitamin D has been identified as a potentially important marker of CVD, the mechanisms through which it might modulate cardiovascular risk are not fully understood. Given this background, in this work we summarise clinical retrospective and prospective observational studies linking vitamin D levels with cardio-metabolic risk factors and vascular outcome. Moreover, we review various randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of vitamin D supplementation on surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk. Considering the high prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among patients with high cardiovascular risk, vitamin D replacement therapy in this population may be warranted; however, further RCTs are urgently needed to establish when to begin vitamin D therapy, as well as to determine the dose and route and duration of administration.

Recent compelling evidence suggests a role of vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and insulin secretion derangements, with a consequent possible interference with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mechanism of this link is incompletely understood. In fact, vitamin D deficiency is usually detected in obesity in which insulin resistance is also a common finding. The coexistence of insulin resistance and vitamin D deficiency has generated several hypotheses. Some cross-sectional and prospective studies have suggested that vitamin D deficiency may play a role in worsening insulin resistance; others have identified obesity as a risk factor predisposing individuals to exhibit both vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance. The available data from intervention studies are largely confounded, and inadequate considerations of seasonal effects on 25(OH)D concentrations are also a common design flaw in many studies. On the contrary, there is strong evidence that obesity might cause both vitamin D deficiency and insulin resistance, leaving open the possibility that vitamin D and diabetes are not related at all. Although it might seem premature to draw firm conclusions on the role of vitamin D supplementation in reducing insulin resistance and preventing type 2 diabetes, this manuscript will review the circumstances leading to vitamin D deficiency and how such a deficiency can eventually independently affect insulin sensitivity.

We read with interest the article by Alvarez et al, which aimed to investigate the relations of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] and parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations with direct measurements of insulin sensitivity, after robust measures of body composition and fat distribution were accounted for. We would like to express our opinion and a different interpretation of the data provided by authors, with the hope that other points for discussion are brought up.

In a very recent publication, Alvarez et al provided novel findings suggesting that dietary vitamin D is independently associated with insulin sensitivity in African Americans (AAs) but not in European Americans (EAs). Interestingly, the 2 groups were identical for hepatic insulin sensitivity [homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)], whereas Si, a method for measuring insulin sensitivity that encompasses both hepatic and peripheral tissues, was lower in AAs, therefore suggesting a pivotal role for insulin resistance in skeletal muscle [especially in the presence of identical body mass index (BMI)] in correlation with 25(OH)D. In the present article, the authors suggest that 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations are independently associated with whole-body insulin sensitivity and suggest that these variables may influence insulin sensitivity through independent mechanisms. In fact, multiple linear regression analysis indicated that 25(OH)D and PTH concentrations were independently related to Si after adjustment for age, race, and intraabdominal adipose tissue. It is well known, however, that adipose tissue is the natural reservoir for lipo-soluble 25(OH)D. The higher BMI and the higher subcutaneous fat content found in AAs (although the latter difference was not statistically significant) could therefore explain the differences in 25(OH)D concentration, as well as in HOMA index, found by the authors.

The prevalence of hypovitaminosis D is high among obese subjects. Further, low 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration has been postulated to be a risk factor for type 2 diabetes, although its relation with insulin-sensitivity is not well investigated. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between 25(OH)D concentration and insulinsensitivity, using the glucose clamp technique. In total, 39 subjects with no known history of diabetes mellitus were recruited.

The association of 25(OH)D concentration with insulin-sensitivity was evaluated by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Subjects with low 25(OH)D (<50nmol/l) had higher BMI (P = 0.048), parathyroid hormone (PTH) (P = 0.040), total cholesterol (P = 0.012), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P = 0.044), triglycerides (P = 0.048), and lower insulin-sensitivity as evaluated by clamp study (P = 0.047). There was significant correlation between 25(OH)D and BMI (r = −0.58; P = 0.01), PTH (r = −0.44; P < 0.01), insulin sensitivity (r = 0.43; P < 0.01), total (r = −0.34; P = 0.030) and LDL (r = −0.40; P = 0.023) (but not high-density lipoprotein (HDL)) cholesterol, and triglycerides (r = 0.45; P = 0.01).

Multivariate analysis using 25(OH)D concentration, BMI, insulin-sensitivity, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglycerides, as the cofactors was performed. BMI was found to be the most powerful predictor of 25(OH)D concentration (r = −0.52; P < 0.01), whereas insulin-sensitivity was not significant. Our study suggested that there is no cause–effect relationship between vitamin D and insulin-sensitivity. In obesity, both low 25(OH)D concentration and insulin-resistance appear to be dependent on the increased body size.

ULTIMI ARTICOLI